Microwave Journal
www.microwavejournal.com/articles/40784-characterization-of-a-mos2-film-frequency-doubler-with-direct-current-bias
Featured-40784.jpg

Characterization of a MoS2 Film Frequency Doubler with Direct Current Bias

September 15, 2023

The strong nonlinearity of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) provides a basis for microwave and mmWave devices. Under natural conditions, MoS2 exhibits a strong third-order nonlinearity, and it demonstrates a second-order nonlinearity with applied voltage. Based on this unique electrical property, a voltage-controlled MoS2 frequency doubler is designed. With an input power of 20 dBm at 1 GHz, the output power is -27 dBm at 2 GHz. Experimental results are consistent with simulation demonstrating an excellent frequency doubling effect. Although this work was conducted at 1 GHz, MoS2 has unique advantages for higher frequency applications as well. This offers new possibilities for controlling the electrical properties of two-dimensional (2D) semiconductor materials.

Studies have shown that 2D materials such as transition metal dihalides play an important role in optoelectronics due to their strong nonlinearities. MoS2 is a new type of 2D semiconductor material with an ultra-thin, layer-like structure. It not only has a controllable bandgap and a special hexagonal crystal structure but also possesses a strong electrical nonlinearity. In 2017, Säynätjoki et al.1 investigated the nonlinear properties of monolayer and multilayer MoS2. It was shown that monolayer MoS2 has a strong optical nonlinearity; the third harmonic is 30x stronger than the second harmonic.

The nonlinear property of MoS2 can be used to make devices such as microwave frequency multipliers and mixers that have unique advantages in microwave and mmWave device applications. In 2019, Fang et al.2 used the nonlinearity of MoS2 to fabricate a microwave triplexer. The MoS2-based triplexer, with an input power of 14 dBm and an input frequency of 0.75 to 1.1 GHz yielded an output power at the third harmonic of -27.1 dBm with a conversion loss of 41.1 dB, but the second harmonic effect was poor.

The nonlinear behavior of MoS2 changes with applied DC bias. Based on this property, the design described is of a frequency doubler using a stable 2H MoS2 semiconductor crystal.3,4

Modeling of MoS2 is important for the simulation of nonlinear devices based on it. In this work, MoS2 is equated to a reverse parallel diode pair. Simulation shows that the model matches well with measured results and that the frequency doubling effect can be adjusted by changing bias voltage.

By applying bias voltage to both sides of the MoS2 crystal, the second harmonic output power is increased and the third harmonic output power is reduced. The proposed doubler has a compact structure with a simple fabrication process, making it suitable for the development of micro and nanodevices.

DESIGN AND MODELING

MoS2 Frequency Doubler Design Overview

Figure 1

Figure 1 MoS2 frequency multiplier topology.

The design takes advantage of the strong nonlinear microwave properties of MoS2, which are suitable for nonlinear devices such as a frequency multiplier.5 The structure comprises a bandpass filter, a bias circuit and a microstrip gap of MoS2 (see Figure 1). The circuit is designed on an FR-4 substrate with thickness H = 0.8 mm and relative dielectric constant εr = 4.41. The microstrip line thickness is T = 0.35 μm and its loss tangent TanD = 0.02. The 50 Ω microstrip line width is 1.41 mm with a gap length of 0.35 mm. The MoS2 crystal is in the form of a tape sticker from Shenzhen Six Carbon Technology Company.

The bandpass filter eliminates clutter with a passband of 400 to 1200 MHz covering the operating band of 800 to 1100 MHz. DC is provided on both sides of the microstrip gap by bias networks to enhance second harmonic emission from the MoS2 and improve the frequency doubling efficiency.

Modeling

When metal is in contact with a semiconductor material (Schottky contact), a potential barrier, called a Schottky barrier, is formed at the metal-semiconductor junction.6,7 The Schottky barrier controls the current and capacitance characteristics at the contact surface, which in turn affects the electrical properties of the Schottky semiconductor.8-10

Based on the electrical conductivity of MoS211-14 and the relationship between multilayer MoS2 and monolayer MoS2,15 MoS2 can be equated to a nonlinear resistance and capacitance in parallel. The equivalent circuit based on the resistor-capacitor model tends to ignore the parasitic capacitance, resulting in a slight difference between simulated and measured results.

Schottky diodes are designed based on the physical properties of metal-semiconductor Schottky contacts, for which a diode model is proposed that can effectively describe the frequency doubling characteristics of MoS2 films. According to the theory of MoS2 Schottky contacts,16-18 the MoS2 Schottky junction is equivalent to a combination of a resistor and an anti-parallel diode pair. The Cu-MoS2 and MoS2-Cu interfaces in the circuit form the reverse-connected Schottky diodes.

The I-V characteristic of a nonlinear device can be represented by:19,20

Where u is the voltage u = V0 + u0 applied to the nonlinear device. Equation (2) is a series expansion of Equation (1):

Where αn (n = 0, 1, 2…) is determined by Equation (3).

and V0 is the bias voltage.

MoS2 has a strong nonlinearity, with its odd-order harmonic signal output being greater than the value of its even-order signal output when V0 = 0.21,22 Consequently, the nonlinear characteristic of multilayer MoS2 without bias is represented by Equation (4).

When V0≠ 0, the value of the even-order signal is increased and the value of the odd-order signal is attenuated. Therefore, the nonlinear characteristic of the MoS2 film is described by Equation (2) when a bias voltage is added, and the values are different with different bias voltages.

In summary, carrier conductivity is adjusted to obtain the greatest frequency doubling effect.23 The series-connected resistance represents the finite conductivity of the MoS2 crystals. A current path is formed between the semiconductor and the external circuit when a voltage is applied. The MoS2 circuit model can be equated to a resistor-diode model; the diode equivalent model simulates its nonlinear characteristics.

Figure 2

Figure 2 MoS2 resistor-diode model.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Simulated output spectrum without bias voltage.

SIMULATION

The simulation circuit is shown in Figure 2. The simulation is carried out without and with bias voltage applied. Without bias, the simulation results are shown in Figure 3. The third harmonic output power is about -35 dBm, while the second harmonic output power is barely -50 dBm. When the bias voltage is 21 V, the simulation results are shown in Figure 4. The second harmonic output power is about -32 dBm, while the third harmonic output power is about -45 dBm. The simulation results of the MoS2 equivalent diode model show that by applying a bias voltage to its terminals, the third harmonic decreases and the second harmonic increases.

Figure 4

Figure 4 Simulated output spectrum with bias voltage applied.

Figure 5

Figure 5 Test setup.




TESTING

To verify the accuracy of the diode equivalent model, a prototype MoS2-based frequency multiplier is fabricated and tested by connecting it to an RF signal source and spectrum analyzer. The RF signal source provides a fixed input frequency of 1 GHz at 20 dBm (see Figure 5).

Figure 6

Figure 6 MoS2 frequency doubler output spectrum (V0 = 0 V).

Figure 7

Figure 7 MoS2 frequency doubler output spectrum (V0 = 21 V).

After measuring the output without bias voltage, input DC bias is gradually increased to 30 V in 0.5 V steps. As a function of voltage, the second and third harmonic is observed on the spectrum analyzer. Figure 6 shows the spectrum at 0 V where the second harmonic output power is below -60 dBm. Figure 7 shows the spectrum at 21 V (determined to be optimum for this MoS2 sample). Optimum bias is dependent upon the MoS2 film thickness and crystal structure. At 21 V bias, the output power at the second harmonic is -27 dBm. The trend with bias voltage is shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8

Figure 8 Output power at the second harmonic as a function of bias voltage at a fixed input power of 20 dBm.

Figure 9

Figure 9 Output power at the second harmonic as a function of input power at a fixed bias of 21 V.

With a fixed bias voltage of 21 V, Figure 9 shows output power of the second harmonic as a function of input power. The output power gradually increases when the frequency and bias voltage are fixed.

CONCLUSION

A voltage-controllable microwave frequency doubler is based on a 2D MoS2 film. MoS2 film possesses strong nonlinear characteristics, and its nonlinear efficiency is further improved with applied DC bias. In this work, a frequency doubler is developed leveraging these characteristics. With an input power of 20 dBm at 1 GHz, the output power of the second harmonic is below -60 dBm without bias voltage applied. With 21 V bias applied, the output power of the second harmonic is -27 dBm, an improvement of 33 dB. Simulation using a theoretical model equating the MoS2 film to a reverse parallel diode pair agrees well with measurements.

References

  1. A. Säynätjoki, L. Karvonen, H. Rostami, A. Autere, S. Mehravar, A. Lombardo, R. A. Norwood, T. Hasan, N. Peyghambarian, H. Lipsanen, K. Kieu, A. C. Ferrari, M. Polini and Z. Sun, “Ultra-Strong Nonlinear Optical Processes and Trigonal Warping in MoS2 Layers,” Nature Communications, Vol. 1, No. 1, October 2017.
  2. Y. Fang, X. Hou, H. Sheng, X. Zhong and Y. Guo, “Characteristic Analysis of Microwave Multilayer MoS2 and Graphene Frequency Tripler,” Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 33, No. 8, May 2019, pp. 972–980.
  3. S.H. El-Mahalawy and B. L. Evans, “Pressure Dependence of the Electrical Conductivity in 2H-MoS2 and 2H-WSe2,” Physica Status Solidi (b),Vol. 86, No. 1, March 1978, p. 151–157.
  4. I. Song, C. Park and H. C. Choi, “Synthesis and Properties of Molybdenum Disulphide: from Bulk to Atomic Layers,” Royal Society of Chemistry Advances, Vol. 5, No. 10, 2015, pp. 7495–7514.
  5. C. Chen, Y. Fang, L. Q. Ge, X. Hou, H. Sheng, J. Liu, B. Zeng, X. Zhong and Y. Guo, “Low Conversion Loss and High Isolation Harmonic Mixer Based on Multilayer Graphene,” AIP Advances, Vol. 8, No. 10, October 2018.
  6. R. T. Tung, “Electron Transport at Metal-Semiconductor Interfaces: General Theory,” Physical Review B, Vol. 45, No. 23, June 1992, pp. 13509–13523.
  7. F. Maiwald, F. Lewen, B. Vowinkel, W. Jabs, D.G. Paveljev, M. Winnewisser and G. Winnewisser, “Planar Schottky Diode Frequency Multiplier for Molecular Spectroscopy up to 1.3 THz,” IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, Vol. 9, No. 5, May 1999, pp. 198–200.
  8. H. A. Bethe, “Theory of the Boundary Layer of Crystal Rectifiers,” Semiconductor Devices: Pioneering Papers, 1991. p. 387–399.
  9. J. T. Louhi and A. V. Raisanen, “On the Modeling and Optimization of Schottky Varactor Frequency-Multipliers at Submillimeter Wavelengths,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 43, No. 4, April 1995, pp. 922–926.
  10. S. M. Sze and K. K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.
  11. A. Taghizadeh and T. G. Pedersen, “Nonlinear Optical Selection Rules of Excitons in Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides,” Physical Review B, Vol. 99, No. 23, June 2019.
  12. S. H. El-Mahalawy and B. L. Evans, “Temperature Dependence of the Electrical Conductivity and Hall Coefficient in 2H-MoS2, MoSe2, WSe2, and MoTe2,” Physica status solidi (b), Vol. 79, No. 2, February 1977, pp. 713–722.
  13. Y. M. Xiao, W. Xu, B. Van Duppen and F. M. Peeters, “Infrared to Terahertz Optical Conductivity of n-Type and p-Type Monolayer MoS2 in the Presence of Rashba Spin-Orbit Coupling,” Physical Review B, Vol. 94, No. 15, October 2016.
  14. G. F. Mkrtchian, A. Knorr and M. Selig, “Theory of Second-Order Excitonic Nonlinearities in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides,” Physical Review B, Vol. 100, No. 12, September 2019.
  15. C. H. Wu, “Integer Quantum Hall Conductivity and Longitudinal Conductivity in Silicene Under the Electric Field and Magnetic Field,” The European Physical Journal B, Vol. 92, No. 25, February 2019.
  16. D. B. de Araújo, R. Q. Almeida, A. C. Gadelha, N. P. Rezende, F. C. C. S. Salomão, F. W. N. Silva, L. C. Campos and E. B. Barros, “Controlling the Electronic Bands of a 2D Semiconductor by Force Microscopy,” 2d Materials, Vol. 7, No. 4, Sept. 2020.
  17. J. Quereda, J. J. Palacios, N. Agrait, A. Castellanos-Gomez and G. Rubio-Bollinger, “Strain Engineering of Schottky Barriers in Single- and Few-Layer MoS2 Vertical Devices,” 2D Materials, Vol. 4, No. 2, January 2017.
  18. N. D. Bharathi and K. Sivasankaran, “Influence of Metal Contact on the Performance Enhancement of Monolayer MoS2 Transistor,” Superlattices and Microstructures, Vol. 120, August 2018, pp. 479-486.
  19. D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, Fourth Edition, 2012.
  20. R. Nakai and N. Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal Thermal and Thermoelectric Transport of Electrons in Noncentrosymmetric Crystals,” Physical Review B, Vol. 99, No. 11, March 2019.
  21. Y. Li, Y. Rao, K. F. Mak, Y. You, S. Wang, C. R. Dean and T. F. Heinz, “Probing Symmetry Properties of Few-Layer MoS2 and h-BN by Optical Second-Harmonic Generation,” NANO Letters, Vol. 13, No. 7, July 2013, pp. 3329–3333.
  22. C. Janisch, Y. Wang, D. Ma, N. Mehta, A. L. Elías, N. Perea-López, M. Terrones, V. Crespi and Z. Liu, “Extraordinary Second Harmonic Generation in Tungsten Disulfide Monolayers,” Scientific Reports, Vol. 4, No. 5530, July 2014.
  23. R. -N. Wang, G. -Y. Dong, S. -F. Wang, G. -S. Fua and J. -L. Wang, “Variations of Thermoelectric Performance by Electric Fields in Bilayer MX2 (M = W, Mo; X = S, Se),” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol. 19, No. 8, January 2017, pp. 5797–5805.